The Last Billable Hour: The End of Traditional Consulting?

Will AI make traditional consulting redundant?

Since the mid-20th century, the consultancy industry has had an unshakeable grasp on global boardrooms which generally accepted the notion that complex problems required external expertise to fill resource gaps. Consultants have served as the modern-day CEO’s right-hand man, legitimising decisions and challenging existing organisation behaviour. However, the industry faces a multi-faceted dilemma: Generative AI. As AI continues to advance, consultants may have new tools at their disposal, but they also face the challenge of AI being a swift cost-efficient alternative for a large proportion of a consultant’s workflow. This brings the question - will AI make traditional consulting redundant? This article will assess AI's threat of disintermediation and then analyse the possible strategic pivots, from co-opetition with tech firms to the adoption of value-based pricing models, required for the industry's continued survival and profitability.

The Disintermediation Dilemma: Replacement or Co-opetition?

AI's current capabilities strongly suggest its potential to entirely replace consultant insight rather than merely augment it. The technology enhances consulting deliverables by accelerating speed and boosting quality, strengthening the overall value proposition. A study on BCG consultants found that those using AI on complex tasks were 25% faster and achieved 40% higher quality work. Firms are already internalising this efficiency; McKinsey's internal model, "Lilli", handles over 500k prompts monthly, proving AI can manage significant workflow volume. This success creates the core threat of client adoption. If major corporations, such as Facebook which is investing $27 billion into its own AI capabilities, leverage their internal data to create AI agents, they could completely replace external consultant insight. However, the same BCG study noted AI limitations, finding that usage reduced output quality by 19% outside of specific parameters, suggesting that specialised human expertise is currently required for large-scale projects. However, the primary argument here is that AI's proven efficiency and quality gains are so substantial that they pave the way for clients to disintermediate consulting firms by insourcing AI as a complete substitute.

To prevent total replacement by AI, consultancies are adopting a co-opetition strategy through strategic alliances. The partnership between Bain & Company and OpenAI exemplifies this, demonstrating the importance of collaborating with tech leaders to control the implementation of AI. This hybrid model allows firms to become gatekeepers of AI adoption rather than victims of it. By offering client guidance on AI implementation, consultancies not only enhance their value offering but also open a crucial new market. This is timely, as the wider consulting industry currently faces a slump in traditional service demand. Securing roles in AI implementation offers a potential lifeline, aligning with the historical pattern of consulting developing in waves, where firms actively source new markets when traditional ones decline. Moreover, these new ITconsulting projects—which often span years, unlike the typical 3–6 month strategy turnaround—could offer a more stable and profitable project pipeline

The End of the Analyst? : Justifying Cost in an Automated Workflow

AI presents a fundamental challenge to the traditional consulting model, specifically threatening the pyramid structure and the billable hour pricing mechanism. The historic setup, which relies on large numbers of junior analysts for repetitive research and number-crunching (justifying a high cost per analyst, approx. £300p/hr) is directly undermined by AI's success in speeding up and replicating these tasks. As AI replaces many junior analysts, firms can no longer justify the cost of billable analyst hours, forcing firms to abandon the high-yielding billable hour model in favor of value-based pricing. Consultant partners anticipate that approximately one-third of projects will transition to value-based pricing by 2033. The core challenge for this shift is whether AI has the enhanced deliverable quality to offset the established profit margins of the billable hour model. Concerns remain about quality assurance, highlighted by the Deloitte Australia scandal, where AI-produced falsified references revealed both AI's limitations and consultants' dangerous over-reliance on the technology. However, the continued contracts awarded to Deloitte suggests clients ultimately prioritise actionable recommendations over the method of generation. Thus, the success of value pricing depends on AI's consistent delivery of high-quality results despite reliability issues.

Policy Recommendations

1. Co-opetition Partnerships

With the threat of clients leveraging AI to replace external insight, it is important for firms to be proactive and become gatekeepers of AI adoption through partnerships with LLM’s like OpenAI, DeepSeek etc.

2. Proactive Movement to Value-Based Pricing

AI undermines the current billable hour model, so it is best to be ahead of the curve and price services on client value created, preventing any tough conversations from clients when AI is utilised. The reduction of analyst hours should offset losses as long as delivery quality is maintained.

3. Mandatory Human Oversight Processes

Whilst AI exceeds human output in some areas, the dictating parameters of when AI or human input is best are blurred. This shortcoming of AI combined with the Deloitte scandal means it is essential for firms to verify AI deliverables to maintain credibility under a value-based model.

Conclusion

In conclusion, AI will not kill the consulting industry, but its current model will come to an end. Whilst AI isn’t an end-to-end replacement of a consultant team, it has proven capabilities that disrupt the traditional billable hour model. The policy recommendations will aid consulting firms in navigating the use of AI and grow alongside the technology. That being said, dynamic technologies can be unpredictable, so a reactive stance may be unavoidable.

Bibliography

Bain & Company (2023). Bain & Company announces services alliance with OpenAI to help enterprise clients identify and realize the full potential and maximum value of AI. [online] Bain. Available at:

https://www.bain.com/about/media-center/press-releases/2023/bain--company-announces-services-alliance-with-openai-to-help-enterprise-clients-identify-and-realize-the-full-potential-and-maximum-value-of-ai/ [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of

Management, 17(1), pp.99–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.

Bloomberg (2023). McKinsey and Its Peers Are Facing the Wildest Headwinds in Years.

Bloomberg.com. [online] 22 Nov. Available at:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-11-22/mckinsey-and-its-consulting-industry-peers-face-the-wildest-headwinds-in-years?embedded-checkout=true [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Choudhury, A. (2024). McKinsey Sees AI Surge Boosting Consulting Amid Industry Slump. [online] Insurance Journal. Available at:

https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2024/08/15/788346.htm [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Christensen, C.M., Wang, D. and Bever, D. (2013) ‘Consulting on the cusp of disruption’,

Harvard business review, pp. 106–114.

Consultancy.uk (2019). Fees & rates. [online] Consultancy.uk. Available at:

https://www.consultancy.uk/consulting-industry/fees-rates [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Consultancy.uk (2025). How AI is revolutionising the traditional consulting model. [online] Consultancy.uk. Available at:

https://www.consultancy.uk/news/39859/how-ai-is-revolutionising-the-traditional-consulting-model [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Dell’Acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K.C., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L.J., Candelon, F. and Lakhani, K.R. (2023). Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality. Social Science Research Network, (24-013). doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4573321.

Equiteq (2025). For Owners of Consulting and Technology Services Firms to Maximize Value 50 TIPS Growing equity, realizing value. [online] Available at:

https://www.equiteq.com/pdfs/equiteq-50-tips.pdf [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Galal, K., Richter, A. and Wendlandt, V. (2012). It Consulting And Outsourcing Firms:

Evolution, Business Models, And Future Prospects. The Oxford Handbook of Management Consulting. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235049.013.0006.

Goldman, S. (2025). Meta’s $27 billion bet turns AI compute into Wall Street’s hottest new investment. [online] Fortune. Available at:

https://fortune.com/2025/10/31/metas-27-billion-bet-turns-ai-compute-into-wall-streets-hottest-new-investment/ [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

McKenna, C.D. (2012). Strategy Followed Structure: Management Consulting and the Creation of a Market for ‘Strategy,’ 1950–2000. Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks, pp.153–186.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-3322(2012)0000029010.

Mckinsey (2023). Rewiring the way McKinsey works with Lilli, our generative AI platform. [online] McKinsey & Company. Available at:

https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/how-we-help-clients/rewiring-the-way-mckinsey-works-with-lilli [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Morris, T., Gardner, H. and Anand, N. (2012). Structuring Consulting Firms. Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235049.013.0014.

Paoli, N. (2025). Deloitte was caught using AI in $290,000 report to help the Australian

government crack down on welfare after a researcher flagged hallucinations. [online] Fortune. Available at:

https://fortune.com/2025/10/07/deloitte-ai-australia-government-report-hallucinations-technology-290000-refund/ [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Shetty, P., Upadhayaya, A., Shah, P.M., Jagabathula, S., Nayak, S. and Fee, A.J., 2025. Advanced Financial Reasoning at Scale: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on CFA Level III. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02954.

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3),

pp.355–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010.

Tussell (2024). Public Sector Management Consultancy Market: will Labour slash consultancy costs? [online] Tussell.com. Available at:

https://www.tussell.com/insights/public-sector-management-consulting-market [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].

Wootton, H. (2025). Deloitte AI report not enough to halt government contracts. [online] Australian Financial Review. Available at:

https://www.afr.com/rear-window/ai-scandal-not-enough-to-stop-canberra-s-addiction-to-deloitte-20251007-p5n0nd [Accessed 31 Oct. 2025].